ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026
Performance-normalized life cycle assessment of calcined and mechanochemically activated clays in Australia as cement substitutes.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In response to the decreasing availability of high-grade kaolinitic clays, there is a growing shift toward using natural waste clays as supplementary cementitious materials. The performance of these waste clays is generally evaluated based on either strength or environmental impact, but the combination of both is rarely considered. This study undertakes a strength-normalized life cycle assessment to understand the interaction between these two parameters and utilizes the output to identify the most suitable activation process. The study used five Australian natural waste clays activated by calcination (600-900 °C) and high-shear mechanical grinding, replacing 30% of the general-purpose cement by mass with the activated clay. The environmental impacts were normalized to MPa using the Australian life cycle impact assessment framework. Results revealed that calcined binders achieved up to 18.6% lower global warming potential than general-purpose cement. However, burden shifting can be observed, with mechanochemically activated clays exhibiting up to 255% higher abiotic depletion potential, primarily due to increased electricity consumption and the use of steel grinding media. Sensitivity analysis showed that reducing transport distance by 100 km decreased resource depletion by 3.0%, human health impacts by 0.7%, and ecosystem damage by 0.5%. Using projected renewable energy sources and alternative fuel sources for activation reduced environmental impacts by up to 18%. These results underscore that the suitability of activated natural waste clays depends not only on the percentage of cement replacement but also on clay type, activation method, energy source, and transport logistics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.