ArticleJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology2026
Association between environmental and headphone noise and heart rate variability: observations from Apple Hearing Study cohort.
Article in Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnvironmental noise is linked to adverse cardiovascular effects. However, few studies have examined people's heart rate variability (HRV) changes related to noise sources, despite the elevated cardiovascular risk associated with reduced HRV.
objectivesWe investigated HRV changes following short- and long-term lagged environmental and headphone sound exposure, assessed using the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN). We also examined effect modification by individual characteristics.
methodsEligible participants were a subset of consented adults from the Apple Hearing Study, a nationwide prospective cohort. Analyses were constructed into four analytical cohorts defined by sound source (environmental vs. headphone) and exposure window (short-term: 20 min vs. long-term: 160 min). In each cohort, twenty participants were randomly sampled from each unique age-sex-ethnicity group. Smartwatches and smartphones measured sound levels and 1-min SDNN estimates. Distributed lag non-linear hierarchical Bayesian models estimated lag-specific and overall changes in first-stage analyses, adjusting for time of day and physical activity, with random effects to capture individual-specific variation. Second-stage linear regression models summarized the average change by age, sex, BMI, stress, self-rated hearing ability, and tinnitus.
resultsThe stratified sampling ranged from 980 to 1180 participants across analyses. An overall SDNN reduction of 6.8% (short-term) to 16.0% (long-term) was observed following a 10-decibel increase in environmental noise exposure, and 7.1% (short-term) to 7.4% (long-term) for headphone sound. Lag-specific prediction showed brief initial SDNN increases followed by sustained reductions. Greater SDNN reductions were seen in older adults, individuals with tinnitus, or individuals who reported excellent hearing (for environmental noise) or those who reported poor hearing (for headphone sound). SIGNIFICANCE: Findings suggested noise-HRV relationships differed by exposure window, noise source, and individual characteristics, highlighting the importance of stratified risk assessment, especially in the elderly and individuals with hearing loss. However, generalizability may be limited by cohort characteristics and reliance on consumer-grade wearables. IMPACT: The physiological stress associated with noise exposure can persist from minutes to hours, as reflected by decreasing heart rate variability associated with elevated noise exposure levels. Given the association between chronically low heart rate variability and higher risk of cardiovascular diseases, noise source-specific risk assessments and noise control efforts are warranted for future studies on the non-auditory health effects, particularly for vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42697936What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.