ArticleJournal of human hypertension2026
Using electronic clinical decision support in primary care to enhance identification of primary aldosteronism: a protocol for the CONSEP cluster-randomised controlled trial.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary aldosteronism (PA) is a common and treatable cause of hypertension, affecting up to 15% of patients in primary care, yet it remains substantially underdiagnosed. Recent international guidelines recommend routine screening for PA in all individuals with hypertension, highlighting the need for effective implementation strategies in general practice. We aim to determine whether an electronic clinical decision support (eCDS) tool integrated into general practice software improves PA screening and diagnosis. CONSEP (CONn Syndrome screening and Evaluation in Primary care) is a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial conducted in general practices across three Australian states. Practices will be block-randomised by size and location (state) in a 1:1 ratio to intervention (eCDS) or control. Patients eligible for analysis will be adults with hypertension attending participating practices. De-identified data will be extracted from clinical software at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months. Analyses will follow intention-to-treat principles using regression models accounting for clustering at the practice level. Primary outcomes are the proportion of patients screened for PA within 12 months and the proportion diagnosed with PA within 24 months. Secondary outcomes include blood pressure control, antihypertensive medication burden, cost-effectiveness, and a process evaluation assessing acceptability, feasibility, and sustainability. By embedding guideline-based screening into routine workflows, this trial addresses a major evidence-practice gap in hypertension care. If effective, the intervention could improve hypertension management, increase detection of PA, and reduce long-term cardiovascular risk in primary care.
Identifiers
42697927What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.