ArticleSpinal cord2026
Association between the number of fused levels and surgical outcomes following posterior cervical fusion for degenerative cervical myelopathy.
Article in Spinal cord, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designProspective multicenter cohort study.
objectivesTo evaluate the association between the number of fused levels and clinical outcomes following posterior cervical fusion for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).
settingMulticenter registry study in Japan.
methodsData from a prospective multicenter cervical spine surgery registry were analyzed. Seventy-seven patients with DCM who underwent posterior cervical fusion and completed 2-year follow-up were included. Patients were stratified by the number of fused levels: 1 level (n = 27), 2-3 levels (n = 34), and ≥4 levels (n = 16). Clinical outcomes included cervical JOA score, VAS, SF-36, NPSI, and JOACMEQ. Cervical alignment and range of motion were radiographically evaluated.
resultsCervical alignment was similar among groups, whereas postoperative cervical ROM was significantly reduced in the ≥4-level group (p = 0.011). No significant differences were observed in JOA, SF-36, NPSI, or VAS outcomes. However, a lower JOACMEQ cervical function effectiveness rate was observed in groups with more fusion levels (p = 0.004). Perioperative complication rates were comparable across groups.
conclusionAlthough a greater number of fused levels was associated with reduced patient-perceived cervical function, no significant between-group differences were observed in neurological recovery, pain relief, or overall quality of life. These findings support preoperative counselling regarding postoperative cervical function when multilevel fusion is clinically indicated. However, because fusion length was determined according to clinical indications in this observational study, residual confounding by indication cannot be excluded, and the findings should be interpreted cautiously.
Identifiers
42697913What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.