ArticleScientific data2026
A multi-category eye image dataset for AI-based segmentation and analysis of eyelid disorders.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multi-category eye image dataset for AI-based segmentation and analysis of eyelid disorders.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abnormal eyelid position and morphology can cause visual dysfunction, ocular surface damage, and facial deformities, highlighting the need for accurate eyelid assessment. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled automated analysis of eyelid abnormalities using external eye images, but development is limited by the lack of publicly available datasets with multi-category disorders and standardized structural annotations. To address this gap, we constructed a clinically annotated eye image dataset of 1,414 images from eight common eyelid disorders and a normal control group. Each image includes diagnostic labels and manual annotations of three key periocular structures: eyelid fissure, cornea, and eyebrow. Image quality evaluation and expert verification were performed to ensure annotation reliability. Inter- and intra-annotator consistency demonstrated excellent agreement. A baseline Attention 2D U-Net segmentation model trained on the dataset achieved Dice coefficients of 0.93, 0.96, and 0.89 for the eyelid fissure, cornea, and eyebrow, respectively. This dataset provides a valuable resource for automated segmentation, quantitative periocular measurement, and AI-assisted eyelid analysis, supporting standardized and reproducible approaches for eyelid assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.