ArticleScientific reports2026
Novel RT‒qPCR-based blood signatures for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whole-blood gene expression has the potential to become an affordable alternative for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Through an immune-based gene expression profile via the NanoString platform, we previously identified 12 genes from whole blood that distinguished active TB from other pulmonary diseases. Here, we performed a three-phase diagnostic test evaluation to determine the scientific validity and analytical and clinical performance of these 12 previously identified genes in accurately diagnosing active TB. We further employed binary classification machine learning models to assess and evaluate transcriptional signatures. Samples from 175 adults were included in the study. During phase one, we assessed the expression of 12 genes in 10 TB patients and 9 healthy controls. Elevated expression of FCGR1A, GBP5, PDCD1LG2, and IRAK3 was observed in TB patients compared with healthy controls (p value < 0.05). The analytical performance of these four genes was evaluated in a cohort of 100 symptomatic respiratory volunteers screened for TB, comprising 35 tuberculosis patients and 65 non-tuberculosis controls. The expression of FCGR1A, PDCD1LG2, and GBP5 consistently distinguished patients from both groups, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) ≥ 0.75. These genes were combined into three transcriptional signatures (FCGB-2TB, FPG-3TB, and FCPD-2TB), which demonstrated good performance in a pilot clinical validation study phase (N = 56; sensitivity > 77%, specificity > 94%). The present analysis allowed the discovery of RT‒qPCR-based signatures for TB diagnosis. These signatures could serve as affordable alternatives for TB diagnosis at primary care centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.