Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42697882›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

The membrane-to-cortex distance regulates mDia1 activity to control cortical mechanics.

Léanne Strauss, Sergio Lembo, Samuel F Gérard, Marc Siggel, Dorothy Cheng, Martin Bergert, Sarah K Foster, Joseph Vermeil, Mauricio Toro-Nahuelpan, Lena M Fischer and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Léanne Strauss *Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Sergio Lembo *Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Samuel F GérardCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Marc SiggelMolecular Systems Biology Unit, EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany.
Dorothy ChengCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin BergertCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3222-8929
Sarah K FosterCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Joseph VermeilInstitut Curie, PSL University, CNRS, Paris, France.
Mauricio Toro-NahuelpanCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5333-3640
Lena M FischerCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Qin YuCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4652-0795
Ewa SitarskaCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Chii Jou ChanDevelopmental Biology Unit, EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3177-3949
Jan KosinskiMolecular Systems Biology Unit, EMBL, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthieu PielInstitut Curie, PSL University, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2848-177X
Olivia du RourePhysique et Mécanique des Milieux Hétérogènes (PMMH), CNRS, ESPCI Paris-Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6364-612X
Julien HeuvinghPhysique et Mécanique des Milieux Hétérogènes (PMMH), CNRS, ESPCI Paris-Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Julia MahamidCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6968-041X
Alba Diz-MuñozCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany. diz@embl.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6864-8901

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) DI 2205/3-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shape of animal cells is controlled by their surface, which comprises the cell cortex, a peripheral actin network, tethered to the plasma membrane by membrane-to-cortex attachment proteins. Changes in cortical components have long been considered to dominate the regulation of forces and mechanical properties at the cell surface and drive morphogenesis. Here, we show that the coupling of the cortex to the membrane is also key for the regulation of its mechanical properties. By combining molecular engineering with biophysical approaches and in-cell cryo-electron tomography we describe the cell surface with nanometer-resolution and link its organization to cell-scale mechanics. We find that membrane-to-cortex attachment proteins can physically draw the cortex closer to the membrane, in a density and length-dependent manner. This reduction of the membrane-to-cortex distance controls the activity of the formin mDia1, leading to a reduction in cortical tension. Our study thus defines a novel mechanism whereby the membrane-to-cortex distance is a functional geometrical parameter that regulates cell surface properties.

Indexed as

Cell MembraneForminsActinsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCryoelectron MicroscopyHumansMiceActinsDiaph1 protein, mouseFormins

Identifiers

PMID42697882
PMCPMC13545285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.