ArticleNPJ breast cancer2026
Proteomic signatures identify significantly different inflammatory breast tissue microenvironments depending on mammographic density or estrogen exposure.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast density and estrogen exposure are two major risk factors for breast cancer; however, the underlying biological mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Here, we investigated the extracellular proteomic landscape of normal human breast tissue in situ to define the microenvironment associated with these risk factors. Forty-two postmenopausal women with nondense or dense breasts and 19 premenopausal women underwent microdialysis. We quantified 461 inflammatory proteins in breast tissue and matched subcutaneous fat, enabling discrimination between local and systemic alterations. Breast density was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging. Dense breast tissue exhibited a distinct protein signature characterized by immune-related signaling, altered lipid metabolism, and the extracellular presence of intracellular proteins, consistent with cellular stress and immune modulation, with limited changes in angiogenic and extracellular matrix remodeling proteins. In contrast, estrogen-exposed breasts displayed a proteomic profile dominated by pro-inflammatory cytokines, angiogenic factors, extracellular matrix remodeling proteins, and complement activation, indicative of a dynamic and pro-tumorigenic microenvironment. These findings demonstrate that breast density and estrogen exposure are associated with fundamentally distinct breast microenvironments, both permissive for tumor progression. These breast-specific protein signatures provide mechanistic insight into how these risk factors contribute to cancer development and suggest that effective prevention strategies may require differential targeting.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.