ReviewBioFactors (Oxford, England)
Multi-Omics Biomarker Signatures for Precision Diagnosis and Prognosis in Primary Liver Cancer: A Literature Review.
Review in BioFactors (Oxford, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary liver cancer (PLC) is a biologically heterogeneous group of malignancies dominated by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), and a smaller subset of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA), and its clinical burden remains high because current diagnostic and prognostic tools do not adequately capture molecular diversity. Conventional imaging, serum markers, and histopathological assessment remain insufficient for precise early diagnosis, subtype-resolved classification, and outcome stratification, while tissue and liquid biopsy approaches have expanded the range of analytes available for clinical assessment. Recent studies have identified candidate biomarker signatures across genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and circulating layers, suggesting that integrated multi-omics profiling may better represent tumor lineage, clonal evolution, immune context, and therapeutic vulnerability than isolated molecular readouts. However, these layers are not equally mature for clinical use: genomic testing is closest to routine therapeutic application in iCCA, plasma methylation assays are advancing for HCC surveillance augmentation, and many proteomic or metabolomic panels remain validation-stage tools. Their clinical value remains constrained by sampling bias, biospecimen-dependent signal loss, assay standardization, cost, and the need for prospective validation across clinically diverse populations. This narrative review critically synthesizes current evidence on multi-omics biomarker signatures for precision diagnosis and prognosis in primary liver cancer and argues that clinically useful signatures should be question-specific, stage-aware, and specimen-aware rather than universal multi-analyte panels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.