Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42697831›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie2026

Wanting, Yet Doubting: Moderating Role of Gender on the Relationship Between Ambivalence and Childbearing Desires.

Joanna Leśniak, Monika Mynarska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joanna LeśniakInstitute of Psychology, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0626-976X
Monika MynarskaInstitute of Psychology, Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9702-6009

Funding

National Science Centre 2018/30/E/HS4/00449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childbearing ambivalence-the coexistence of positive and negative evaluations regarding having children-has become an important focus in fertility research. Prior studies have primarily examined its role in contraceptive use and parenthood postponement, yet little is known about how ambivalence relates to the desire for children, particularly in the early, motivational stages of reproductive decision-making. This study investigates the association between subjective ambivalence towards childbearing and individuals' childbearing desires, with particular attention to gender differences. The analysis covers a sample of 831 childless individuals (520 women and 311 men) aged 20-35, who participated in a nationwide study on childbearing motivations in Poland, in December 2022. Respondents completed measures of subjective ambivalence and childbearing desire. Regression and moderation analyses were applied. Our findings indicate that higher ambivalence was associated with lower childbearing desire among men but with stronger desire among women. Although generally modest, these associations suggest that ambivalence may reflect distinct evaluative processes in women and men. Because the data are cross-sectional, it remains unclear whether ambivalence shapes desire differently by gender, whether stronger desire heightens ambivalence specifically among women, or whether reciprocal processes are involved. Longitudinal research is needed to clarify the direction and mechanisms of these associations.

Indexed as

AttitudeMotivationReproductive BehaviorAdultFemaleHumansMalePolandSex FactorsYoung Adultchildbearing attitudeschildbearing decisionschildbearing desiresubjective ambivalence

Identifiers

PMID42697831
PMCPMC13545014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.