ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Late Cross-Modal Biases in Neural Spatial Representations Revealed by EEG Decoding.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During audiovisual perception, spatial information from vision and audition is combined, often producing biases such as the ventriloquist effect. While these interactions are well documented behaviorally, it remains unclear when cross-modal information begins to alter modality-specific spatial representations in the brain. Here we used cross-generalized inverted encoding modeling of electroencephalography (EEG) data to track the temporal evolution of spatial representations during a spatial ventriloquist task. Human participants (both sexes) localized audiovisual stimuli with horizontally offset auditory and visual components. Decoders trained on unisensory EEG responses were applied to audiovisual trials to estimate whether and when spatial representations of one modality were biased toward the other. Behaviorally, participants integrated cues but showed slight visual overweighting. Neural decoding revealed robust spatial representations for both modalities, with early unisensory encoding remaining unaffected by cross-modal input. Cross-modal biases emerged only later (from ∼200 ms onward), within a generalized representational window, and occurred sequentially: auditory representations were biased earlier than visual. These findings indicate that multisensory spatial integration arises via recurrent feedback during later processing stages, while early sensory-specific representations remain independent, providing a neural basis for the temporal dynamics underlying the ventriloquist effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42697719What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.