ArticleBMJ open2026
Social prescribing as relational early intervention to improve children and young people's mental well-being: an interpretive descriptive qualitative study in the North of England.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMental health disorders among children and young people are a substantial global public health concern. Barriers to accessing specialist mental health services, particularly long waiting times, can exacerbate poor mental health. Recently, there has been an increase in the adoption of social prescribing to support children and young people to address this concern; however, the evidence of its impact on mental health remains limited. The key objective of this study was to explore how children, young people and their families experience the impact of a new social prescribing service in the Northwest of England.
designThe qualitative study adopted an Interpretive Description (ID) approach defined by Sally Thorne. Reporting of the study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). PARTICIPANTS AND
settingSemistructured interviews were conducted with 15 children and young people aged 8-17 years who had accessed the social prescribing service. In addition, 27 parents and caregivers of children and young people who had accessed the service were also interviewed. This study formed part of an independent evaluation of the service in which interviews took place both face to face and online. DATA ANALYSIS: Inductive reflexive thematic analysis outlined by Braun and Clarke was employed to analyse the data.
resultsFive themes emerged which described the perceived impact of the service and the key mechanisms of how the impact may have been achieved. Children and young people described feeling less emotional distress, lower levels of anxiety and increased social confidence. The impact extended beyond those in direct receipt of the service, reducing parental stress, improving family interaction and strengthening relationships. Key mechanisms underpinning the impact included a trusting relationship with a link worker and the learning of cognitive coping strategies that were employed to help overcome emotional distress.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that social prescribing may function as a relational early intervention that supports emotional stabilisation and re-engagement with education and social contexts. However, further research is needed to confirm and quantify the effectiveness across different service models and settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.