Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42696936›Full record

ReviewMedical image analysis2026

Foundation models in medical image analysis: A systematic review and quantitative analysis.

Praveenbalaji Rajendran, Mojtaba Safari, Wenfeng He, Mingzhe Hu, Keyur Shah, Shansong Wang, Jun Zhou, Xiaofeng Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical image analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Praveenbalaji RajendranDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Mojtaba SafariDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Wenfeng HeDepartment of Computer Science and Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Mingzhe HuDepartment of Computer Science and Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Keyur ShahDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Shansong WangDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Jun ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Xiaofeng YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA; Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, IL, 60637, USA; Department of Computer Science and Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. Electronic address: xfyang@uchicago.edu.

Funding

Real-time Volumetric Imaging for Motion Management and Dose Delivery VerificationR01CA272991 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Zhen Tian, Xiaofeng Yang · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
Intelligent and Personalized Online Adaptive Proton TherapyR01DE033512 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Zhen Tian, Xiaofeng Yang · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
Artificial Intelligence Driven Platform for PET/MR ImagingR56EB033332 · NIBIB · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MAO, HUI, YANG, XIAOFENG · 2022 to 2022
$764k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA272991NIBIB NIH HHS R56 EB033332NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE033512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in foundation models (FMs) have catalyzed a paradigm shift in medical image analysis. Unlike traditional task-specific artificial intelligence (AI) models, FMs leverage large-scale datasets to learn generalized representations that can be adapted to downstream clinical applications. Despite the rapid proliferation of FM research in medical imaging, there is a lack of unified synthesis that systematically maps the evolution of architectures, training paradigms, and clinical applications across modalities. To address this gap, this review provides a comprehensive and structured synthesis of FMs in medical image analysis by systematically organizing studies into two primary categories: vision-only foundation models (VFMs) and vision-language foundation models (VLFMs), based on their architectural foundations, training strategies, and downstream clinical tasks. A quantitative analysis was conducted on both VFMs and VLFMs to characterize temporal trends in dataset utilization and application domains, along with pooled performance and subgroup analyses. We also critically discuss persistent challenges, including cross-domain generalization, computational scalability, FM evaluation, fairness, and deployment. Finally, we identify key future research directions aimed at enhancing the robustness, interpretability, and clinical integration of FMs, thereby accelerating their translation into real-world medical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningFoundation modelsMachine learningMedical image analysisQuantitative analysis

Identifiers

PMID42696936
PMCPMC13681227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.