ArticleScience advances2026
Few-shot neuromorphic vision in a nonlinear photonic network laser.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the growing prevalence of artificial intelligence (AI), demand increases for hardware that mimics the brain's ability to extract structure from limited data. In the retina, ganglion cells detect features from sparse inputs via lateral inhibition, where neurons antagonistically suppress activity of neighboring cells. Biological neurons exhibit diverse heterogeneous nonlinear responses, linked to robust learning and strong performance in low-data regimes. Here, we introduce a retinally inspired photonic computing system where spatially competing lasing modes in a random network laser act as heterogeneous, inhibitively coupled neurons, enabling feature detection, few-shot classification, and segmentation. This silicon-compatible scheme harnesses heterogeneous excitatory and inhibitory nonlinear physical dynamics, which give rise to emergent photonic computing behavior, including parallel feature detection and strong performance when training data are scarce. We report 98.05 and 87.85% accuracy on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST, and 90.12% on BreakHis cancer diagnosis, outperforming software convolutional neural networks including EfficientNetV2 and the vision transformer ViT in few-shot and class-imbalanced regimes with training sets of up to several hundred images. We demonstrate combined segmentation and classification on the HAM10k skin lesion dataset, achieving DICE and Jaccard scores of 84.49 and 74.80%. These results demonstrate the potential of random lasing networks as nonlinear photonic learning systems and highlight the ability of heterogeneous nonlinear dynamics to support strong learning in challenging low-data scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.