Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42696377›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology (Reading, England)2026

Implications of proteome allocation constraints for understanding interbacterial antagonism.

Sean C Booth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology (Reading, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sean C BoothDepartment of Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria live in dense communities where competition influences the composition and, therefore, the function of these communities. Beyond competing for resources, bacteria engage in antagonism by deploying a range of molecular weapon systems to inhibit and kill other bacteria. Investing in antagonism is expected to incur a fitness trade-off, but the nature of this trade-off at the level of molecular physiology remains underexplained. Applying recent advances about the physiological constraints faced by bacterial cells may help us better understand existing studies and design new investigations into interbacterial antagonism. Bacterial cells face two important constraints: a finite amount of protein and a maximum translation speed for ribosomes. As a result, the only way for a cell to grow faster is to allocate more of its finite proteome to synthesizing ribosomes. A cell choosing to attack competitors must therefore allocate some of its limited proteome budget to antagonistic proteins instead of other functions. Conversely, being attacked and resisting the effects of such attacks also require an investment of proteomic resources. The extent to which proteome allocation constraints influence bacterial physiology is not fully understood; consequently, how these constraints influence interbacterial antagonism has not been investigated. Here, I will discuss how proteome allocation constraints can re-contextualize our existing understanding of the costs of both deploying and resisting attacks and how investigation of these constraints may further our understanding of interbacterial antagonism.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBacterial ProteinsMicrobial InteractionsProteomeProtein BiosynthesisProteomicsRibosomesBacterial ProteinsProteomeantagonismcompetitionproteome

Identifiers

PMID42696377
PMCPMC13544900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.