Observational studyThe Journal of international medical research2026
Computed tomography-guided precision biopsy combined with metagenomic next-generation sequencing for etiological diagnosis in patients with blood culture-negative systemic infections.
Observational study in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy combined with metagenomic next-generation sequencing in patients with blood culture-negative systemic infections and to assess the clinical impact of using this combined strategy for etiological confirmation and guidance of targeted antimicrobial therapy.MethodsThis single-center retrospective observational cohort study enrolled 78 patients who met the Sepsis-3 consensus criteria for suspected systemic infection and had negative conventional microbiological work-ups (at least two sets of blood cultures) between April 2022 and March 2025. All patients underwent computed tomography-guided biopsy of radiologically identified infectious foci, with specimens processed concurrently for conventional culture and metagenomic next-generation sequencing. Diagnostic performance was benchmarked against the final comprehensive clinical diagnosis, and the influence of metagenomic next-generation sequencing findings on antimicrobial therapy modification was analyzed. Sample size calculation, based on a prior study estimating an metagenomic next-generation sequencing detection rate of 85% (α = 0.05, β = 0.2), indicated a minimum of 68 cases; accordingly, 78 patients were enrolled.ResultsComputed tomography-guided biopsy was technically successful in all 78 patients (100%). The pathogen detection rate of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (91.0%, 71/78) was significantly higher than that of conventional culture (55.1%, 43/78;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.