Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42696289›Full record

Trial reportJAMA health forum2026

Designing Social Media Health Warnings for Teenagers and Young Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Anna H Grummon, Clayton Ulm, Amanda B Zeitlin, Marissa G Hall, Jennifer Falbe, Nathan A Kline, Thomas N Robinson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA health forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07199660 (An Evaluation of Social Media Warning Labels for Teens and Young Adults), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07199660 nacompletednot on this map

An Evaluation of Social Media Warning Labels for Teens and Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled1,012ConditionsScreen Time ExposureArmsHuman-developed negative body image warning, Voluntary warning, Human-developed depression and anxiety warning, Human-developed addiction warning, Human-developed sleep warning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna H GrummonDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Clayton UlmDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Amanda B ZeitlinDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Marissa G HallDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill.
Jennifer FalbeDepartment of Human Ecology and Institute for Global Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis.
Nathan A KlineDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Thomas N RobinsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Social media use is nearly ubiquitous among US teenagers and young adults and has been associated with increased risk for negative health outcomes such as depression and anxiety. Policymakers in several states have proposed or adopted policies requiring warnings on social media platforms. Objective: To test whether teenagers and young adults perceive that social media warnings discourage them from wanting to use social media and increase their awareness of the harms of social media. Design, Setting, and Participants: This within-participants randomized clinical trial was conducted online in December 2025 among US teenagers and young adults aged 13 to 29 years. Interventions: Participants viewed 15 messages shown in random order: 13 health warnings about different harms (eg, negative body image, and depression and anxiety), a screen time break warning similar to messages voluntarily displayed on some social media platforms, and a neutral control message. Messages were displayed on a mock social media page. Main Outcomes and Measures: Participants rated each message on a 1 to 5 scale for perceived message effectiveness for discouraging social media use (primary outcome) and awareness of the harms of social media (secondary outcome). Linear mixed models were used to estimate differences in outcomes between message topics, expressed as average differential effects (ADEs). Results: A total of 1012 participants (mean [SD] age, 19.3 [4.5] years; 509 women and girls [50%], 491 men and boys [49%], and 12 individuals who identified as nonbinary or another gender [1%]) completed the study. Participants perceived all health warnings as well as the screen time break warning as more effective than the control message (range of ADEs, 0.32 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.41] to 0.62 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.71]). Participants perceived all health warnings as more effective than the screen time break warning (range of ADEs, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.08 to 0.24] to 0.30 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.37]), except for the health warning about addiction (ADE, 0.07 [95% CI, -0.004 to 0.14]). Similarly, participants perceived all warnings as increasing their awareness of the harms of social media more than the control message (range of ADEs, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.28] to 0.63 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.72]) and all health warnings as increasing their awareness more than the screen time break warning (range of ADEs, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.28] to 0.44 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.52]). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings of this randomized clinical trial suggest that requiring warnings on social media platforms could increase awareness of the harms of social media and discourage teenagers and young adults from wanting to use social media. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07199660.

Indexed as

Health PromotionSocial MediaAdolescentAdultDigital MediaFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMedia ExposureYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42696289
PMCPMC13545666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.