Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42696284›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

State-Level Abortion Policies and Infant Health Outcomes.

Sarah C M Roberts, Claudia Zaugg, Lauren Ralph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah C M RobertsAdvancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland.
Claudia ZauggAdvancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland.
Lauren RalphAdvancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Previous research has found associations between abortion policies and infant health. Differing methods complicate understanding which abortion policies matter for infant health. Objective: To examine associations between multiple state-level abortion policies and infant health. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study obtained birth certificate data and cohort-linked birth-infant death files and used logistic regression, adjusting for individual and state controls, state-year combination fixed effects, state-specific time trends, and standard errors clustered by state, with sensitivity analyses to identify robust findings. Participants included liveborn singleton births in the US from 2005 to 2022. Data were analyzed from January 2025, to June 7, 2026. Exposures: Eleven abortion policies. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were low birth weight (<2500 g), preterm birth (<37 weeks), low Apgar score (<7), and infant death. Results: Among 64 789 079 births, the mean (SD) maternal age was 28.2 (6.0) years; 6.5% (n = 4 193 951) of neonates were low birth weight, 10.3% (n = 6 664 535) were preterm, 1.8% (n = 1 142 835) had a low Apgar score, and 0.53% (n = 341 399) died; 1.6% (n = 1 006 123) of mothers had no prenatal care, and 23.6% (n = 14 449 109) had late prenatal care. Waiting periods (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.97 [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]) and medication abortion in-person requirements (aOR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99]) were associated with decreased low birth weight. For clinician-type qualifications, ambiguity regarding advanced practice clinician provision was associated with decreased infant deaths (aOR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.58-0.83]), physician-only requirements were associated with increased low birth weight (aOR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.05]) and preterm birth (aOR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.02-1.07]), and advance practice clinician provision of medication abortion only was associated with increased low birth weight (aOR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.05]). The 6-week, fetal heartbeat bans were associated with increased preterm births (aOR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.00-1.07]); the 20-week, fetal pain bans were associated with increased low Apgar score (aOR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.06-1.38]); ultrasonography information requirements were associated with increased low Apgar scores (aOR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.02-1.24]); private insurance bans were associated with increased preterm births (aOR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01-1.07]); and hospital transfer agreement requirements were associated with increased low birth weight (aOR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00-1.03]) and increased preterm births (aOR, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00-1.03]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of US births, 5 abortion policies were associated with multiple increased adverse infant health outcomes, whereas 2 were associated with decreased low birth weight. Findings suggest multiple types of abortion policies-and not only total abortion bans-are relevant for infant health.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedHealth PolicyInfant HealthAdultFemaleHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePremature BirthRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42696284
PMCPMC13545670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.