ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026
Physical fitness and pulmonary function in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study with healthy peers.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study examined whether adolescents with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) show functional limitations beyond musculoskeletal alignment by comparing physical fitness and pulmonary function with healthy peers.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, adolescents aged 10-18 years with mild to moderate AIS were matched by age and sex to controls. A total of 48 individuals with AIS and 32 healthy peers were included. Physical fitness was assessed using selected Eurofit tests. Respiratory function was evaluated with spirometric parameters. Due to non-normal distributions, rank-based ANCOVA was applied with sex as a covariate.
resultsVO₂max, estimated from the shuttle run, was significantly lower in the AIS group (p<0.01, η²=0.420), indicating reduced cardiorespiratory fitness. Stage scores were also lower (p<0.01, η²=0.192), supporting impaired aerobic capacity. Flexibility was greater in AIS participants on the sit-and-reach test (p=0.023, η²=0.065), possibly reflecting compensatory adaptations or joint hypermobility. Shuttle run performance (10×5 m) was poorer in AIS (p=0.005, η²=0.096). Handgrip strength (p=0.002, η²=0.117) and broad jump performance (p=0.004, η²=0.104) were also significantly lower in the AIS group after adjusting for sex, whereas no significant differences were observed in spirometric parameters or balance. Sex influenced strength and endurance but not VO₂max, suggesting reduced aerobic capacity is specifically linked to AIS.
conclusionsAdolescents with AIS show impaired aerobic capacity and reduced muscle strength, while flexibility is preserved. Balance and pulmonary function remain unaffected in mild to moderate cases, underscoring the need for multidimensional fitness assessments and further research on scoliosis severity and connective tissue factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42696244What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.