Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42696224›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026

Robotic-assisted transbronchial biopsy versus computed tomography-guided transthoracic needle biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of direct comparative studies.

Atef A Hassan, Mohamed Mostafa El Sheikh, Amr A Hassan, Abdelrahman Mady, Mohab Hesham, Yousef Mohamed Hamroush, Shimaa Mostafa Elnahas Wahdan, Mustafa M Kaff, Mohamed Ashraf Abd El Moniem, Mona Ibrahim Ahmed

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Atef A HassanFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. atefabdo26399@gmail.com.
Mohamed Mostafa El SheikhChest Department, Faculty of Medicine, Kafr El Sheikh University, Kafr El Sheikh, Egypt.
Amr A HassanFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abdelrahman MadyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohab HeshamDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Yousef Mohamed HamroushDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Horus University, New Damietta, Egypt.
Shimaa Mostafa Elnahas WahdanChest Department, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.
Mustafa M KaffDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, New Damietta, Egypt.
Mohamed Ashraf Abd El MoniemDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, New Damietta, Egypt.
Mona Ibrahim AhmedChest Department, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) and computed tomography-guided transthoracic biopsy (CTTB) are competing strategies for sampling peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). Whether they differ in yield or safety is uncertain. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review restricted to direct comparisons. We searched MEDLINE, Europe PMC, Scopus, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 7 July 2026 for studies directly comparing RAB with CTTB in adults with PPLs. The primary outcome was strict 2024 American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians diagnostic yield. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I and certainty with GRADE. A cohort-genealogy step identified, per outcome, the largest set of cohorts sharing no patients; only that set was pooled, with Hartung-Knapp and Mantel-Haenszel sensitivity analyses. Five retrospective studies from one US health system were eligible. Four share patients; at most three cohorts are mutually independent. Across those three, diagnostic yield was comparable (risk ratio [RR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.06; I²=24%; Hartung-Knapp 0.87-1.13), with an identical relative effect under strict and intermediate definitions although absolute yields fell from 88% to 74-84% under strict criteria. Pneumothorax requiring a chest tube and/or admission was about three-quarters less frequent with RAB across all three cohorts (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.14-0.46; I²=0%; Hartung-Knapp 0.07-0.96). Strict yield (RR 0.99) and any pneumothorax (RR 0.06) were reported by two cohorts each and neither survives the few-studies correction. RAB took about 50 min longer than CTTB where same-session staging endobronchial ultrasound was counted in the robotic time, but only about 8 min longer than CTTB where it was not. Only one cohort reported yield by lesion size category and none reported yield by bronchus sign or lung zone, so lesion-level subgroups could not be pooled. Certainty was low for pleural complications and very low elsewhere. Low-certainty evidence indicates that RAB is associated with fewer pleural complications, with no statistically detectable difference in diagnostic yield; equivalence was not formally established. Because all evidence is retrospective, confined to one health system, and almost never stratified by lesion size or accessibility, these findings are hypothesis-generating and require a multicenter randomized trial.

Indexed as

BronchoscopyImage-Guided BiopsyLungLung DiseasesLung NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiopsy, NeedleHumansDiagnostic yieldLung cancerMeta-analysisPeripheral pulmonary lesionPneumothoraxRobotic-assisted bronchoscopyTransthoracic needle biopsy

Identifiers

PMID42696224
PMCPMC13545051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.