Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42696222›Full record

ReviewBlood research2026

Cold agglutinin disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and the evolving therapeutic landscape.

Dae-Ho Choi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dae-Ho ChoiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea. daeho619.choi@samsung.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a rare form of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) that accounts for approximately 15%-25% of AIHA cases and is characterized by two interdependent features: a clonal bone marrow B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder producing monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM)-κ autoantibodies, and complement-mediated hemolysis driven by the classical pathway. Cold agglutinins bind to erythrocytes at low temperatures and trigger C1-initiated complement activation, predominantly leading to C3b-mediated extravascular hemolysis in the liver, with intravascular hemolysis occurring chiefly during acute exacerbations. CAD must be distinguished from cold agglutinin syndrome (CAS), which occurs secondary to infection, malignant lymphoma, or other disorders, and is managed by treating the underlying cause. The 2022 World Health Organization classification recognized CAD-associated lymphoproliferative diseases as distinct entities. Beyond anemia, patients experience disabling cold-induced circulatory symptoms, profound fatigue, and elevated thromboembolic risk. Diagnosis rests on evidence of hemolysis, a monospecific direct antiglobulin test result positive for C3d but negative for immunoglobulin G (IgG), a cold agglutinin titer ≥ 1:64, and bone marrow evaluation; thermal amplitude can predict clinical severity better than titer alone. Corticosteroids and splenectomy are generally ineffective and not recommended. Contemporary management combines B-cell-directed therapy with complement inhibition, the latter being transformed by the anti-C1s antibody, sutimlimab. This review summarizes the pathophysiology, diagnostic approaches, and rapidly evolving treatment landscapes for CAD, including emerging complement- and clone-directed agents.

Indexed as

Autoimmune hemolytic anemiaClassical complement pathwayCold agglutinin diseaseComplementIgMSutimlimab

Identifiers

PMID42696222
PMCPMC13545198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.