ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Network analysis of head and neck symptoms and fear of cancer recurrence in postoperative laryngeal cancer patients: simulation-based intervention modeling.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo examine the network structure linking head and neck symptoms with fear of cancer recurrence (FCR)-related concerns in postoperative laryngeal cancer patients and to identify candidate targets using simulation-based intervention modeling.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 284 postoperative laryngeal cancer patients. Head and neck symptoms were assessed with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck Module, and FCR-related concerns with the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form. Analyses included EBICglasso network estimation, expected influence, bridge expected influence, Bayesian network modeling, and Ising simulation.
resultsThe network contained 239 edges. Check-up anxiety, major treatment worry, and throat sores had the highest expected influence. Disease progression worry, worry about family future, and check-up anxiety were the leading bridge nodes. The Bayesian network identified seven cross-domain arcs. In simulations across all 34 nodes, swallowing difficulty yielded the largest point estimate for simulated aggravation (+ 19.28%; 95% CI 3.42 to 37.89), whereas choking cough yielded the largest point estimate for simulated relief (-17.51%; 95% CI -29.81 to -4.26).
conclusionThese findings highlight the potential value of considering head and neck symptoms and FCR-related concerns together in postoperative assessment and supportive care for patients with laryngeal cancer. Disease progression worry, worry about family future, and check-up anxiety may serve as key bridge nodes. In the full 34-node simulation, swallowing difficulty and choking cough emerged as candidate targets associated with the largest point estimates for simulated aggravation and relief, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42696220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.