Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42696207›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2026

Orchestrating neuroimaging data processing using the 'Snakemake' workflow manager.

Damien J Mannion, Maria Del Mar Quiroga, Jacob M Paul, Marta I Garrido

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Damien J MannionMelbourne Data Analytics Platform (MDAP), The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. damien.mannion@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5520-632X
Maria Del Mar QuirogaMelbourne Data Analytics Platform (MDAP), The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8943-2808
Jacob M PaulMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5711-6408
Marta I GarridoMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0679-4959

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The processing of neuroimaging data typically involves a complicated set of operations, which often require different software packages and have intensive computational and storage demands. Although there are many options available for the neuroimaging researcher to establish their preferred set of processing operations, there is relatively little guidance on how to orchestrate such operations within a coherent data processing workflow. Here, by describing the construction of a simplified neuroimaging processing workflow, we demonstrate how the established general-purpose workflow manager 'Snakemake' can be used to facilitate neuroimaging data processing. Snakemake allows researchers to use a Python-based markup language to describe how input files are transformed into output files. Snakemake then uses these rules to schedule and execute the computational jobs that are required to generate the output files, without unnecessary recreation of existing output files. This allows the complete processing workflow to be executed with a single command and creates workflows that are interpretable, efficient, and reproducible.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeuroimagingSoftwareWorkflowHumansComputingData analysisData processingInfrastructureWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID42696207
PMCPMC13545037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.