ArticleJournal of medical systems2026
Machine Learning-based Early Detection of Intraoperative Anaphylaxis Among Patients with Hypotension Using Real-World Physiological Time Series Data.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntraoperative anaphylaxis remains a rare yet fatal condition that has been a challenge due to its unpredictability. The unique characteristics of physiological parameter changes that precede or occur during the early stages of anaphylaxis may enable timely identification. We aimed to develop machine learning methods for the early detection of intraoperative anaphylaxis among patients with hypotension using real-world time-series physiological data.
methodsPhysiological data, extracted from the EMRs at a 10-second sampling frequency, of patients undergoing surgeries at Peking University People's Hospital (January 1, 2011 - January 1, 2023) were analyzed. Three datasets (Datasets +1Min, +2Min, and +3Min) were constructed, each spanning 10 min before to 1, 2, and 3 min after hypotension, consisting of positive groups (intraoperative anaphylactic patients with hypotension) and negative groups (intraoperative non-anaphylactic patients with hypotension). Random forests, extreme gradient boosting, and categorical boosting (CatBoost) were employed to construct detection models. The model with the best performance was identified with a five-fold cross-validation.
resultsDatasets +1Min, +2Min, and +3Min contained 49, 48, and 44 positive samples and 980, 960, and 880 negative samples, respectively. CatBoost models performed best on both Datasets +3Min and +2Min, achieving on Dataset +3Min an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.851 (± 0.082), an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.431 (± 0.094), a sensitivity of 0.861 (± 0.210), and a specificity of 0.783 (± 0.164); corresponding values on Dataset +2Min were 0.823 (± 0.145), 0.365 (± 0.097), 0.711 (± 0.183), and 0.940 (± 0.065).
conclusionsThis study suggests the feasibility of early detection of intraoperative anaphylaxis among patients with hypotension using physiological time-series data. The models could alert clinicians to suspected anaphylaxis just 2-3 min after hypotension, enabling early detection of intraoperative anaphylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42696196What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.