ArticleOecologia2026
Less cooperative belowground plant mutualists negatively affect aboveground herbivore growth and survival.
Article in Oecologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resource mutualists like nitrogen (N)-fixing rhizobia can improve the quality of plants available to higher trophic levels, particularly primary consumers like insect herbivores. However, there is substantial variation in mutualist quality. How this variation in mutualist quality affects higher trophic levels, such as herbivores, is unclear, as high-quality resource mutualists could increase both leaf nutrient content, which should improve herbivore growth, but also plant chemical defenses, which are expected to negatively impact herbivores. We evaluated the effect of rhizobium strains of varying mutualist quality on the survival and development of a generalist insect herbivore, the beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua), reared on alsike clover (Trifolium hybridum). We inoculated T. hybridum with cooperative ("high-quality") and less cooperative ("low-quality") rhizobia strains, measured plant growth, nutrients, and metabolites, and fed the leaves to S. exigua. We found that high-quality rhizobium strains significantly improved S. exigua survival, but also increased development time compared to low-quality strains. Furthermore, some developmental traits, such as pupal weight and adult wing area, increased in high-quality treatments. Inoculation with strains of varying quality impacted T. hybridum nutrition and phytochemistry, suggesting that both could mediate herbivore responses to mutualist quality. The effects of rhizobium genetic variation on herbivores exceeded the effects of N-fertilization alone: S. exigua fed leaves from uninoculated, fertilized plants had decreased survival compared to caterpillars fed leaves from high-quality partners, implying that N deposition into ecosystems may not fully replace benefits provided by rhizobia to higher trophic levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.