ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
Tumor-Agnostic and Histology-Tuned Targeted Therapies in Gastrointestinal Cancers: NTRK and RET Fusions and the Evolving Role of Molecular Basket Strategies.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor-agnostic targeted therapy has expanded precision oncology by allowing selected molecular alterations to guide treatment across conventional organ boundaries. In gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, however, actionability is not uniformly independent of histology. This narrative review examines NTRK and RET fusions as paradigmatic tumor-agnostic targets and contrasts them with histology-tuned or GI-specific fusion-directed strategies, particularly NRG1 fusion-positive pancreatic adenocarcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Targeted PubMed/MEDLINE and regulatory-agency searches were updated through August 3, 2026. In the initial 55-patient larotrectinib analysis, ORR was 75% by independent review and 80% by investigator assessment; the subsequent expanded pooled analysis reported an investigator-assessed ORR of 79%. By contrast, the dedicated NAVIGATE GI cohort reported an independent-review ORR of 28% across GI cancers and 44% in colorectal cancer. These estimates derive from different cohorts and assessment methods and should not be interpreted as a formal cross-trial comparison. Mature TRIDENT-1 data support repotrectinib in both TRK inhibitor-naive and pretreated disease, including solvent-front mutations. Selpercatinib received traditional US approval in July 2026, whereas zenocutuzumab provides GI-specific options for NRG1 fusion-positive pancreatic and biliary cancers. We separate two dimensions of clinical portability: whether response magnitude is preserved across histologies and whether drug choice, combination, or treatment sequence must be modified for a specific tumor type. MSI-H/dMMR shows high magnitude portability with histology-specific positioning, whereas available dedicated GI data for NTRK fusion illustrate that a tumor-agnostic label does not guarantee a uniform effect size across histologies. Practical implementation requires quantitative prevalence estimates, appropriately selected DNA- and RNA-based testing, recognition of false-positive and false-negative pan-TRK immunohistochemistry, molecular tumor-board interpretation, timely access, and resistance-informed reprofiling. Tumor-agnostic approvals create opportunities, but GI-specific biology determines how reliably and when those opportunities should be used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42696174What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.