ArticleBioresources and bioprocessing2026
High-cell density two-stage self-cycling fermentation system for the enhanced production of ethanol from steam-exploded poplar hydrolysate.
Article in Bioresources and bioprocessing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The economics of lignocellulosic ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae remain a challenge due to low product yields, which can be partially addressed by improving the performance of pretreatment optimization and fermentation systems, an aspect that has received limited attention. In this study, we investigated how the combination of self-cycling fermentation (SCF) with continuous adapted feeding (controlled by evolved gas) in a two-stage system could improve bioethanol production from steam-exploded poplar hydrolysates. This system benefited from the improved productivity associated with SCF and from the high titers obtained in fed-batch operation. The system consisted of a first fed-batch SCF stage, which led to approximately two-fold improvements in cell dry weight compared to conventional batch culture and low residual glucose (< 0.5 g/L), demonstrating efficient substrate utilization by the yeast. The second high-cell density SCF stage was initiated upon reaching a metabolic threshold by adding a pulse feed in the harvested medium to further enhance ethanol titer and productivity. The patterns of glucose consumption, ethanol production, and evolved gas flow rate were all reproducible between the SCF cycles. The two-stage fermentation approach led to final ethanol titer of ~ 11% (v/v) with an overall yield of 0.453 g/g and productivity of 1.33 g/L/h (a 30% improvement over the first stage). Overall, this study presents a robust two-stage high-cell density SCF system for lignocellulosic ethanol production and highlights the feasibility and potential of implementing it in biorefinery processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.