ArticleLasers in medical science2026
Comparison of different cleaning techniques for the removal of root canal sealer from dentine surfaces: An SEM-EDX analysis.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of different cleaning protocols for removing AH Plus root canal sealer remnants from coronal dentine surfaces before adhesive restorative procedures using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Forty-nine dentine specimens prepared from extracted human molars were randomly allocated to seven groups according to the cleaning protocol: negative control, positive control, dry cotton pellet, ethanol with cotton pellet, ethanol followed by 37% phosphoric acid, ethanol followed by air abrasion (53 μm Al₂O₃), and ethanol followed by air abrasion and 37% phosphoric acid. Residual sealer contamination was quantified by measuring zirconium (Zr) weight percentages using EDX, while dentine surface morphology was evaluated by SEM. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed among the cleaning protocols (p < 0.001). The positive control group exhibited the highest zirconium content, whereas no zirconium was detected in the negative control group. Ethanol cleaning significantly reduced residual sealer compared with dry cotton pellet cleaning. Protocols incorporating phosphoric acid and/or air abrasion resulted in significantly lower zirconium levels than ethanol alone; however, no statistically significant differences were observed among these advanced cleaning protocols. The combined ethanol, air-abrasion, and phosphoric acid protocol yielded the numerically lowest residual zirconium content (2.64 ± 0.10 wt%), corresponding to a descriptive reduction of 86.4% relative to the positive control group. Ethanol alone was insufficient for the complete removal of AH Plus sealer remnants. Phosphoric acid and/or air abrasion following ethanol cleaning resulted in significantly lower residual zirconium levels than ethanol cleaning alone, although no statistically significant differences were observed among the advanced cleaning protocols. Further studies are needed to determine whether these improvements in surface cleanliness enhance adhesive performance and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.