ArticleRheumatology international2026
Handgrip strength relative to age- and sex-specific reference values in hospitalised patients with highly active rheumatoid arthritis: a single-centre cross-sectional study.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Handgrip strength (HGS) is a valuable indicator of muscle function that can be used to identify patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at risk of sarcopenia and other functional impairments. The aim of this study was to describe grip strength (HGS) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), to assess the frequency of low HGS, to quantify grip strength relative to age- and sex-specific reference values, and to identify the clinical factors associated with HGS. In this single-centre cross-sectional study, 70 patients with RA had their HGS measured sequentially on both arms using an electronic hand dynamometer, with three measurements taken per arm; the higher of the HGSmeasurementse was taken as the maximum. Low HGS was defined as < 27 kg for men and < 16 kg for women. The maximum HGS was additionally expressed as an age- and sex-adjusted z-score relative to normative data; deviations from the norm were tested using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (with an assumed median z = 0). Spearman's correlation and multivariate linear regression were used to determine the presence of an association with the maximum HGS value. The patients were predominantly women (n = 55; 78.6%), with a mean age of 53.6 ± 13.3 years, presenting with a long-standing course of RF-positive, erosive, highly active disease (median DAS28-ESR 5.6). The mean maximum HGS was 23.9 ± 8.8 kg. Low HGS was observed in 28.6% of patients (20% of women, 60% of men). Compared with age- and sex-matched norms, grip strength was significantly lower in men (median z = -1.71, p = 0.001) and in women (median z = -0.55, p < 0.001) . HGS scores were inversely correlated with age (ρ = -0.4, p = 0.001) and current smoking (ρ = -0.41, p = 0.001) and positively associated with body mass index (BMI) (ρ = 0.35, p = 0.003). Older age was the only variable independently associated with lower grip strength (B = -0.21 kg/year, p = 0.012). In this study, grip strength was low relative to established sarcopenia thresholds and age- and sex-specific reference values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42696125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.