ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026
Effects of immersive gamification technology on the physical function of people with Parkinson's disease: a scoping review.
Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional rehabilitation effectively manages physical impairments in Parkinson's disease (PD), but reduced motivation limits long-term adherence. Immersive gamification technology systems (ImGTS) offer an engaging, safe, and potentially effective approach to improve physical function. However, the scope and characteristics of current evidence remain unclear. This scoping review mapped the literature on the effects of ImGTS on physical function in people with PD. A Boolean search of six databases was conducted in March 2025, supplemented by backward snowballing, to identify all eligible English-language studies indexed up to the date of the search that involved people with PD and evaluated ImGTS for physical function outcomes. Data on study characteristics, population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, and key findings were charted using a standardized form. Screening, data charting, and methodological quality assessment were conducted independently by five reviewers, with disagreements resolved through consensus. Findings were synthesized narratively with descriptive statistics. Twenty-nine studies were included: randomized controlled trials (n = 10, 34.5%), pre-post intervention studies (n = 10, 34.5%), within-subject trials (n = 6, 20.7%), and cross-over trials (n = 3, 10.3%). Most of these studies had low (n = 18, 62.0%) to moderate (n = 10, 34.5%) risk of bias. Games were task-based, goal-oriented, recreational, and multi-level. Balance (n = 17, 58.6%) and gait (n = 16, 55.2%) consistently improved, whereas effects on upper extremity strength, coordination, and function were more variable. Similar platforms were often classified differently in terms of immersiveness, highlighting inconsistent reporting. ImGTS show promise for improving physical function in PD, but evidence is limited by methodological heterogeneity and inconsistent definitions. Future studies should adopt standardized definitions, robust study designs, and context-appropriate ImGTS frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42696108What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.