ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2026
A Re-parameterized Network-Based Lightweight Multimodal Fusion Network for Early Lung Cancer Risk Prediction.
Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection of lung cancer using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is critical for improving patient outcomes. In this study, we propose a RepViT-based lightweight multimodal fusion network (Rep-LMFNet) framework, which integrates LDCT imaging and structured clinical information for risk prediction. The framework incorporates adaptive multi-scale module (ASMM), dynamic channel recalibration module (DCRM), adaptive feature enhancement module (AFEM), and hierarchical multimodal fusion module (HMFM) to improve feature representation and multimodal interaction. Experimental results under stratified five-fold cross-validation demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.877 (95% CI: 0.874-0.880), accuracy of 0.922 ± 0.002, sensitivity of 0.847 ± 0.010, specificity of 0.924 ± 0.002, and F1-score of 0.385 ± 0.010. Comparative experiments reveal that our model exhibits competitive advantages over several representative lightweight and hybrid architectures, while maintaining low computational cost with 11.9 M parameters and 1.9G floating-point operations per second (FLOPs). Multimodal learning consistently outperformed the single-modal configuration, indicating the effectiveness of integrating CT imaging with clinical features for early lung cancer risk assessment. The proposed framework provides an effective and computationally efficient solution for computer-aided early lung cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42696090What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.