ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Time-dependent effects of BCG plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in BCG-naive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a reconstructed patient-level analysis.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThree phase 3 trials (CREST, POTOMAC, ALBAN) adding an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in BCG-naive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) reported different results. We used reconstructed individual patient-level data (rIPD) to examine the overall event-free survival (EFS) effect and its change over time.
methodsThis post hoc analysis used data reconstructed from published Kaplan-Meier curves rather than original trial datasets, harmonized as EFS. A trial-stratified Cox model estimated the pooled hazard ratio (HR). Two-parameter Weibull models described the timing of events (scale, β) and the temporal pattern of risk (shape, α), with proportional hazards assessed by Schoenfeld residuals and log-log plots. The trials differed in agent, endpoint definition, and BCG schedule.
resultsReconstructed event counts and HRs closely matched reported values. The pooled EFS HR was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.91), and 0.68 (95% CI 0.54-0.85) after excluding ALBAN. Weibull-based cumulative HRs suggested differing time patterns: the fitted cumulative HR decreased over time in CREST, remained broadly stable in POTOMAC, and approached 1 in ALBAN. Model-based 5-year EFS differences (11.5%, 8.4%, and 0.4%) were exploratory, relying on extrapolation in CREST and sparse tail data in ALBAN.
conclusionICI plus BCG was associated with improved EFS, mainly reflecting CREST and POTOMAC. A single-pooled HR may obscure regimen-level differences in how the benefit evolves over time. Given the reconstructed data, between-trial differences, and restriction to efficacy, these findings are hypothesis-clarifying rather than practice-changing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42696081What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.