Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42696069›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

Procedure-specific outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch across a decade of MBSAQIP adoption.

Mohamed Hany, Mohamed H Zidan, Ala Wafa, Ehab Elmongui, Hazem Al-Momani, Khaled Hamdan, Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi, Rodolfo Oviedo

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohamed HanyDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. mohamed.ashour@alexu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6650-8112
Mohamed H ZidanAlexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7425-356X
Ala WafaMisurata University, Jamahiriya, Libya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4860-5899
Ehab ElmonguiIndependent Biostatistical Consultant, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9497-8159
Hazem Al-MomaniNMC Royal Khalifa Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8693-1364
Khaled HamdanKhalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Mahmoud Diaa HindawiFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3085-6665
Rodolfo OviedoDepartment of Surgery, Nacogdoches Medical Center, Nacogdoches, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3784-6555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic adoption in metabolic and bariatric surgery has increased, but its procedure-specific short-term outcomes remain uncertain. This study compared robotic and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) over a decade. The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database was queried for primary RYGB and BPD-DS performed from 2015 to 2024. Missing data were addressed using multiple imputation followed by stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting. Propensity-score and outcome models were fitted separately within four predefined procedure-period strata: RYGB 2015-2019, RYGB 2020-2024, BPD-DS 2015-2019, and BPD-DS 2020-2024. Thirty-day outcomes were estimated within each stratum, with Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery-rate adjustment applied across the modeled comparisons. The analysis included 411,155 patients: 87,028 R-RYGB, 307,420 L-RYGB, 5,283 R-BPD-DS, and 11,424 L-BPD-DS. Robotic utilization increased from 8.6% to 44.0% for RYGB and from 28.2% to 50.3% for BPD-DS. For RYGB, the robotic approach was associated with higher readmission in both periods (OR 1.23 and 1.19), lower odds of serious complications (OR 0.84 and 0.87), and longer operative duration (mean differences 39.83 and 26.17 min). For BPD-DS, robotic surgery was associated with higher readmission in both periods (OR 1.38 and 1.25), higher intervention in 2015-2019 (OR 1.65), and longer operative duration (mean differences 87.49 and 40.85 min). BPD-DS estimates were less precise, and some associations attenuated in the complete-case sensitivity analysis. Robotic utilization increased substantially but was associated with longer operative duration and higher readmission for both procedures, without a clear overall 30-day safety advantage. BPD-DS findings were less precise and should be considered exploratory.

Indexed as

Biliopancreatic DiversionDuodenumGastric BypassLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidRobotic Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeBiliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switchComparative effectivenessMBSAQIPMetabolic and bariatric surgeryRobotic surgeryRoux-en-Y gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID42696069
PMCPMC13545063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.