ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2026
Fully coupled patient-specific fluid-structure interaction modeling of post-TAVI hemodynamics compared with echocardiographic measurements.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop a fully coupled, patient-specific fluid-structure interaction (FSI) framework for quantitative assessment of post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) hemodynamics and valve biomechanics, and to compare selected simulation-derived hemodynamic indices with post-procedural echocardiographic measurements. Patient-specific geometries were reconstructed from pre-operative computed tomography angiography in five subjects treated with SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3) devices. Structural TAVI deployment was simulated using Abaqus/Explicit and subsequently coupled with FlowVision for performing a two-way post-TAVI FSI analysis. Personalized boundary conditions were derived from clinical measurements, including heart rate, blood pressure, and echocardiographic flow data. Predicted peak velocity, effective orifice area (EOA), and transvalvular pressure gradients (TPG) were quantitatively compared with post-procedural echocardiography using empirical cumulative distribution functions and area-based error metrics. The FSI framework reproduced realistic leaflet kinematics and patient-specific flow patterns, highlighting marked inter-patient variability despite identical device types. Average of predicted peak systolic velocity (2.66 ± 0.59 m/s) and TPG (22 ± 10.7 mmHg) showed good agreement with echocardiographic measurements as the area metric was below 10% for both peak TPG and velocity. Larger discrepancies were observed for EOA due to patient variability and reliability of echocardiographic measurements. The model additionally quantified biomechanical and hemodynamic parameters, including leaflet stress, time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), and blood residence time (BRT). The proposed fully coupled FSI framework enables patient-specific analysis of post-TAVI hemodynamics and valve mechanics for S3 balloon-expandable intra-annular system. The preliminary comparison with echocardiographic measurements showed good agreement for peak velocity and peak TPG, while larger EOA discrepancies highlight the need for further clinical benchmarking using larger cohorts and more direct measurement modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.