ArticlePsychological research2026
My name is, who? On being misnamed by a relative or a romantic partner.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present survey investigated how people felt (i.e., irritated, sad or amused) when a relative or a romantic partner called them by someone else's first name. It also explored links between these reactions, self-esteem, the own name's symbolic value and one's own propensity to misnaming others. Participants reported more misnaming incidents committed by a relative than by a partner. Moreover, they were significantly more irritated when a partner misnamed them than when a relative did so. Globally, naming incidents did not trigger very strong negative feelings but participants reported correcting their interlocutor in a majority of incidents. Correlation analyses could only be performed on misnaming incidents committed by a relative, as incidents with partners were too infrequent. The intensity of feelings associated with these incidents were not predicted by self-esteem or the own name's symbolic value. However, resulting irritation was less intense and amusement stronger in participants who reported being themselves more prone to misnaming others. The link between people's metacognitive beliefs about their own naming abilities and the intensity of their feelings when they are misnamed is discussed. Finally, participants considered that the own name was a weaker symbol of personal identity than the own face. The advantage for the own face was nevertheless numerically small.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42696057What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.