ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2026
Outcomes of living donor liver transplantation in elderly Egyptian patients: a retrospective study.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAlthough the results of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the elderly have been reported worldwide, there is still a dearth of information on elderly patients in Egypt. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes of LDLT in this growing population group.
methodsThis was a retrospective study that evaluated all LDLT patients at the Gastrointestinal Surgical Center, Mansoura University, from January 2009 to December 2023. Based on the recipient's age, two patient cohorts were created: younger (< 60) and elderly (≥ 60). Demographics, liver disease etiology, MELD score, surgical duration, blood loss, and early and late post-transplant outcomes (complications, graft survival, and patient survival) were compared between the two groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was done to improve the baseline covariates imbalance.
resultsAmong 967 LDLT operations, 110 patients were classified in the elderly group (≥ 60 years). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was markedly more prevalent in the elderly group (44.6% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.002). After PSM analysis, the occurrence of early post-transplant problems was greater in the elderly group (65.5% vs. 51.9%, p = 0.033). Major complications were comparable between both groups (p = 0.763). Importantly, there was no statistically significant difference in 90-day mortality (p = 0.697) or in the 1, 3, and 5-year survival rates (p = 0.660) between the two matched groups.
conclusionLiving donor liver transplantation for carefully selected elderly recipients yields comparable early survival outcomes to younger recipients. However, the elderly cohort faces a significantly higher risk of early morbidity and not statistically significant lower graft survival. Rigorous selection and targeted perioperative care are therefore essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.