ArticleChemistry & biodiversity2026
Phenolic Profiling and Bioactivity Evaluation of Stachys aleurites Extracts: LC-ESI-MS/MS Characterization, Antioxidant Capacity, and Enzyme Inhibitory Potential.
Article in Chemistry & biodiversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Natural products rich in phenolic compounds are increasingly investigated as multifunctional agents against oxidative stress and enzyme-related disorders. This study characterized the phytochemical composition and evaluated the antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activities of methanol and aqueous extracts of Stachys aleurites. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents were determined spectrophotometrically, while selected phenolics were quantified by LC-ESI-MS/MS. Antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory properties were assessed using complementary in vitro assays. The methanol extract contained higher levels of total phenolics (48.86 mg GAE/g) and flavonoids (65.36 mg RE/g) than the aqueous extract. Verbascoside and chlorogenic acid were the predominant compounds in the methanol extract, whereas p-coumaric acid was relatively more abundant in the aqueous extract. The methanol extract exhibited stronger antioxidant activity in most assays and showed greater inhibition of AChE, tyrosinase, α-amylase, and α-glucosidase. In contrast, the aqueous extract displayed slightly higher metal-chelating activity and stronger BChE inhibition. These findings demonstrate solvent-dependent variations in phytochemical composition and bioactivity, highlighting the importance of extraction solvent selection and supporting further studies on the bioactive constituents of S. aleurites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.