ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026
Limit of Blank Variability as a Determinant of Analytical Sensitivity in a DNA-Binding Dye-Based Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital PCR is considered a highly sensitive technique for detecting low-abundance DNA in samples containing excess background DNA. This is particularly relevant for Chlamydia pneumoniae infections, as this obligatory intracellular bacterium can be disseminated by phagocytes from the respiratory tract throughout the whole body. Although persistent bacteria are associated with chronic inflammatory diseases, currently, no diagnostic tools for persistent C. pneumoniae infections exist. In this study, an EvaGreen-based digital PCR assay targeting the chlamydial 16S rRNA gene was initially developed for the QX200 Droplet Digital PCR system; however, poor target recovery, insufficient restriction enzyme digest, and incompatibility with the DNA isolation workflow limited assay performance. Consequently, the assay was redesigned to target the chlamydial groL gene. Analytical performance was determined according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP17-A guideline and the ISO 20395:2019 standard. Notably, the limit of blank varied up to 4-fold between different PCR reagent lots, substantially affecting limit of detection estimates and assay interpretation at low-level. These findings demonstrate the critical importance of assay specification and reagent validation for diagnostics with DNA-binding dye-based assays. Nested PCR exhibited superior analytical sensitivity over the digital PCR assays, yet the limited throughput and increased handling complexity of nested PCR restrict its suitability for routine diagnostic applications. Overall, this study highlights important practical limitations and validation requirements for highly sensitive molecular diagnostic assays.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.