Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42695336›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2026

Digital Mindfulness Intervention for Pregnant Women With Affective Disorders and Acute Stress Reactions: Prespecified Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kathrin Haßdenteufel, Mitho Müller, Jan Multmeier, Harald Abele, Sara Yvonne Brucker, Stefan Zipfel, Johanna Graf, Armin Bauer, Peter Jakubowski, Jan Pauluschke-Fröhlich and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kathrin HaßdenteufelDepartment of Gynecologic Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69120, Germany, 49 062215637021.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0141-7425
Mitho MüllerDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians- University, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8431-540X
Jan MultmeierFreie Universität Berlin, Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2825-6716
Harald AbeleDepartment of Women's Health, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0429-7118
Sara Yvonne BruckerDepartment of Women's Health, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8588-1094
Stefan ZipfelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1659-4440
Johanna GrafClinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR-University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6862-4720
Armin BauerDepartment of Women's Health, Research Institute for Women's Health, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2885-0965
Peter JakubowskiDepartment of Women's Health, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8602-4235
Jan Pauluschke-FröhlichDepartment of Women's Health, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2953-3682
Markus WallwienerDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4139-9340
Stephanie WallwienerDepartment of Obstetrics and Perinatal Medicine, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2045-650X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pregnant women with Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of an 8-week digital mindfulness-based intervention (eMBI) compared with treatment as usual (TAU) among pregnant women with Methods: This prespecified secondary analysis was conducted within a multicenter RCT in Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Pregnant women aged 18 years and older with elevated depressive symptoms (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale [EPDS]>9) and Results: Of the 5299 screened women, 147 met the inclusion criteria for this subgroup analysis (intervention group [IG] had n=73 women and control group had n=74 women). Groups were comparable at baseline. The IG showed significantly greater reductions in EPDS scores at gestational week 34 (Δ=-2.21, Conclusions: In this prespecified subgroup of pregnant women with

Indexed as

MindfulnessMood DisordersPregnancy ComplicationsStress, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyanxietydepressiondigital interventionmental disordermindfulnesspregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42695336
PMCPMC13542807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.