ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2026
Movement Strategies During the Penultimate and Final Steps of a Change of Direction Following Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy.
Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persistent knee offloading is well-documented after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM). Yet, it remains unclear if this extends to higher-demanding change-of-direction (CoD) tasks and how step-specific strategies influence joint loading. We aimed to compare joint power and relative contributions in the surgical limb, contralateral limb, and healthy individuals during a 90° CoD. A secondary aim examined the relationship between knee negative power at the penultimate and final foot contacts across limb sequences. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected from 24 post-APM and 20 healthy individuals using motion capture with force plates. Participants performed a running approach before executing a 90° CoD. Linear mixed-effects models compared limb differences and examined the relationship between steps. During penultimate contact, APM limb showed lower magnitudes of total (mean difference 2.80 W/kg, 95% CI 0.59, 5.00) and knee (2.60 W/kg, 0.75, 4.46) negative power than healthy limbs, with lower knee (-10.57%, -19.63, -1.52) and higher ankle (10.13%, 0.47, 19.79) contributions. During final contact, APM limb showed lower magnitudes of knee negative power (0.65 W/kg, 0.06, 1.24) than contralateral limbs. Compared with healthy, APM limb showed lower positive knee and ankle power, with lower knee (-7.23%, -14.19, -0.27) and greater hip (9.73%, 0.33, 19.13) contributions. Persistent knee deficits occurred post-APM, characterized by ankle-dominant braking and hip-dominant propulsion. Limb sequence influenced knee loading, with APM penultimate contact shifting braking to the contralateral limb at final contact. These findings suggest rehabilitation approaches may benefit from prioritizing knee function while preparing the ankle and hip to tolerate redistributed loads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.