ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026
The Hypoalgesic Effects of Pleasant Music Are Not Fully Explained by Distraction.
Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does Music Relieve Pain Through Distraction?European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOne explanation for the hypoalgesic effects of pleasant music is that these stimuli impact pain by eliciting positive emotion. However, it is not clear how much of this effect is due to attentional bias, as pleasant music may more effectively capture attention than neutral or aversive control conditions. As pain reduction by distraction and emotion represent distinct mechanistic pathways, differentiating the role of attention from that of emotion and mood is necessary to understand how pleasant music impacts pain.
methodsIf effects are due to attention, performing a challenging cognitive task during music listening should attenuate analgesia through competition for limited cognitive resources. We investigated this possible sub-additive interaction using a within-subject factorial design. Pain-free, healthy participants received thermal stimulations as they completed easy and difficult tasks while listening to music, scrambled music, or silence. We then assessed an interaction effect between the effects of task and music condition to test whether the auditory manipulation's effect on pain varied with task difficulty.
resultsThe type of auditory stimulation and type of task had independent effects on pain intensity and unpleasantness, where music reduced pain in comparison to scrambled music and the 2-back reduced pain compared to an easier task. Tests for a possible interaction between the two factors did not support the hypothesis that music and cognitive tasks both reduce pain by demanding attention.
conclusionsWhile listening to music involves attentional processes that facilitate distraction, our results suggest that the emotional impacts of music can operate independently of these processes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: What makes music hypoalgesic, is it simply the distraction it provides? This study is the first to disentangle the role of attention from other mechanisms, finding that music can reduce pain independently of where attention is directed. These results have direct implications for music therapy, supporting the centrality of other mechanisms such as emotion in therapeutic frameworks and highlight the importance of examining both attentional and emotional pathways to pain relief in future mechanistic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.