Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42695125›Full record

Trial reportJournal of primary care & community health

Implementation of Expanding Primary Care Teams to Improve Anemia Diagnosis.

Rebecca Wells, Xiao Li, Zhanna Novikov, Mary Espinoza, Mariesa Janecka, Xochitl K Olguin, Bolanle Adebowale, Eric J Thomas

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05735314 (A New Combination of Evidence-Based Interventions to Improve Primary Care Diagnostic Safety and Efficiency), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05735314 narecruitingnot on this map

A New Combination of Evidence-Based Interventions to Improve Primary Care Diagnostic Safety and Efficiency: a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Control Trial (RCT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonRan2024 to 2026Enrolled450ConditionsAnemia, Decreased Glomerular Filtration RateArmsEnhanced diagnostic team implementing three evidence-based interventions, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebecca WellsDepartment of Management Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Centre at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1526-3263
Xiao LiDepartment of Management, College of Business and Technology, The University of Nebraska at Kearney, Kearney, NE, USA.
Zhanna NovikovDepartment of Management Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Centre at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Mary EspinozaUT Physicians, Houston, TX, USA.
Mariesa JaneckaUT Physicians, Houston, TX, USA.
Xochitl K OlguinUT Physicians, Houston, TX, USA.
Bolanle AdebowaleDepartment of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Centre at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Eric J ThomasUT Physicians, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Center for Clinical and Translational SciencesUM1TR004906 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Maria Eulalia Fernandez, LORNA H. MCNEILL · 2024 to 2026
$16.7M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS028779NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004906
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction/ObjectivesThis study examined factors affecting implementation of a primary care team expansion designed to improve timely diagnosis of causes of new anemia. This intervention introduced nurse navigators, who enrolled eligible patients and coordinated follow-up testing, and a clinical pathologist, who provided diagnostic interpretations to primary care providers.MethodsPatients were enrolled between December 2023 and December 2025 across 12 primary care clinics using a cluster randomized stepped-wedge design. We measured implementation through administrative data and interviews with 90 clinic staff prior to and 3 months into implementation at each clinic.ResultsPersonalized outreach improved provider participation. Simplified enrollment improved patient participation. Approximately 70% of patients got follow-up blood draws. Providers were sometimes unclear about the new workflow but also viewed the expanded team as an improvement which fit how they preferred to communicate with patients and was easy to implement.ConclusionsThis study found that a new primary care team process could be facilitated through a combination of personal outreach and efficiency, and that monitoring implementation revealed opportunities to enhance provider and patient engagement. Subsequent reporting will address the effects of this process on rates of timely anemia diagnosis. The trial registry name is 'A New Combination of Evidence-Based Interventions to Improve Primary Care Diagnostic Safety and Efficiency' and the URL is https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05735314.

Indexed as

AnemiaPatient Care TeamPrimary Health CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Participationanemia diagnosisinitial implementationpractice managementprimary carequality improvementteam-based careteam expansion

Identifiers

PMID42695125
PMCPMC13547807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.