Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42695088›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of palliative care

Integrating Evidence on Dignity Therapy in Cancer Care: A Review.

Maria Vinu, Poonam Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of palliative care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria VinuDepartment of Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences and Languages, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4263-4872
Poonam SharmaDepartment of Social Sciences, School of Social Sciences and Languages, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As psychosocial treatments become increasingly important in palliative care, dignity therapy (DT) emerges as a promising intervention. This systematic review aims to synthesize and critically evaluate the evidence on DT interventions in adults with cancer by integrating findings from randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies. The search terms 'Dignity Therapy' AND 'Cancer' were used to identify RCTs, quasi-experimental, mixed methods and qualitative studies related to DT implemented in adult cancer patients from Scopus and Web of Science databases on 20th November, 2024. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists were used to assess the risk of bias in the studies. Twenty studies were included after a two-stage screening process, out of which 7 were RCTs, 6 were quasi-experimental studies, 5 were qualitative studies and 2 were mixed-method studies. These studies demonstrate that DT enhances dignity, reduces psychological distress and improves family dynamics, particularly in culturally adapted formats. Quantitative findings demonstrate significant improvements in dignity-related outcomes (

Indexed as

CancerDignity therapyPalliative careSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42695088
PMCPMC13541055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.