ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
Divergent management of a distal left main coronary artery aneurysm presenting as non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: surgical vs. medical strategy in two cases-a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Left main coronary artery (LMCA) aneurysms are exceedingly rare, found in ∼0.1% of coronary angiograms, and acute coronary syndromes are an uncommon first presentation. When the aneurysm involves the distal LMCA and its bifurcation, percutaneous covered-stent treatment is generally not feasible, leaving surgical and medical therapy as the only realistic options, with no controlled data to favour either. Case summary: We report two male patients presenting with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and thrombosed distal LMCA aneurysms. Both patients were evaluated by a multidisciplinary heart team but received divergent therapeutic strategies. Case 1 (44-year-old male) underwent surgical revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting and aneurysm ligation following unsuccessful percutaneous recanalization of the left circumflex artery. Case 2 (65-year-old male) declined surgery and was managed medically with intensive antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy. Both remained asymptomatic during three months of follow-up. Discussion: This case series underscores the diagnostic and therapeutic complexity of thrombosed distal LMCA aneurysms. Although surgical exclusion of the aneurysmal sac may, on anatomical grounds, be hypothesized to reduce the risk of recurrent thromboembolism, medical management remains a legitimate option in selected patients who decline or are unsuitable for surgery. The risk of recurrent thrombosis in medically managed patients remains incompletely characterized, and the short follow-up in our cases limits long-term conclusions. In the absence of randomized controlled trials, management decisions must be individualized through multidisciplinary heart team discussion, incorporating aneurysm size, morphology, thrombus burden, clinical presentation, and patient preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.