ArticleCureus2026
The Gil Classification: A Novel Anatomical and Surgical Staging System for Reverse Abdominoplasty.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reverse abdominoplasty is a body-contouring and reconstructive technique in which redundant upper abdominal skin and soft tissue are resected through an inframammary incision and the resulting flap is advanced cephalad rather than caudally, as in conventional abdominoplasty. Although first described more than five decades ago, the procedure remains comparatively underused, and its literature is limited to small retrospective case series without a shared framework for grading the severity of upper abdominal laxity or standardizing operative planning. The authors reviewed the published literature on reverse abdominoplasty spanning esthetic, post-bariatric, and reconstructive applications and used it, together with clinical experience, to develop a four-tier anatomical and surgical classification system, herein termed the Gil classification. Type I describes laxity confined to the upper hemiabdomen with a preserved myoaponeurotic wall, managed through bilateral crescentic incisions confined to the inframammary fold with conservative adjunctive liposuction. Type II reflects similar aponeurotic integrity but a thicker adipofascial flap that requires a continuous horizontal inframammary incision and more extensive liposuction to achieve flat coaptation. Type III introduces myoaponeurotic compromise localized to the upper hemiabdomen and periumbilical region, requiring supra- and, selectively, infraumbilical plication. Type IV denotes generalized myoaponeurotic weakness and diastasis affecting the entire abdominal wall, requiring an extended submammary incision, plication in both vertical and horizontal planes, and a T- or H-pattern approach. For each tier, expected skin laxity, aponeurotic status, liposuction strategy, incision pattern, plication requirements, and compatible synergistic procedures (mastopexy, augmentation, or reduction mammaplasty; oncologic or burn reconstruction) were defined. This was accompanied by tier-specific technical considerations, including strategies to prevent the compensatory "pouching effect" after superior plication and principles for preserving perforator-based flap vascularity. This classification is intended to standardize preoperative assessment, guide operative planning, and provide a common reference for future comparative studies, addressing a gap that the existing reverse abdominoplasty literature has not previously addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.