Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42695037›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2026

Surgical correction of a rigid sagittal and coronal plane cervical-thoracic deformity.

Daniel Faraj, Emily Melissa Drennan, Michael Galgano

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel FarajDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, United States.
Emily Melissa DrennanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, United States.
Michael GalganoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rigid cervical-thoracic sagittal and coronal plane deformities are uncommon but profoundly debilitating conditions, impairing horizontal gaze and diminishing quality of life. Progressive kyphosis can result from many etiologies, including interbody cage subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), resulting in loss of anterior column support and eventual fusion in a malaligned position. Surgical correction of these complex deformities requires meticulous planning, and an approach tailored to the severity of the deformity. Posterior-based approaches, including upper thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy, can be effective for many fixed cervical-thoracic deformities; however, they may not provide sufficient correction in select cases of severe combined sagittal and coronal malalignment. Case Description: We demonstrate a staged surgical approach for correction of a rigid cervical-thoracic deformity. Stage 1 consists of an anterior cervical approach entailing traction, removal of the subsided cages, multilevel corpectomy, and C7/T1 ACDF. Stage 2 utilizes posterior instrumented fusion of C2-L2 with multiple posterior column osteotomies to achieve definitive deformity correction and stabilization. Conclusion: The presented technique demonstrates how a staged anterior-posterior strategy can achieve correction of severe, rigid deformities that may not be amenable to a posterior-only approach. Careful patient selection and individualized surgical planning remain essential to optimize outcomes.

Indexed as

Cervical spineRigid deformitySagittal deformitySurgical techniqueThoracic spine

Identifiers

PMID42695037
PMCPMC13541047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.