ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Patients' satisfaction after orthognathic surgery among the Saudi population in the Eastern Province: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated changes in patient-reported functional, aesthetic, and psychosocial outcomes before and after orthognathic surgery and assessed overall satisfaction among patients treated in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among 100 patients who underwent orthognathic surgery at Dammam Medical Complex, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected through structured telephone interviews using a questionnaire adapted from previously published instruments and translated into Arabic. Paired multi-category outcomes were analyzed using the Stuart-Maxwell test, paired binary outcomes using the McNemar test, and p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The sample included 53 females and 47 males, with a mean age of 29.4 ± 5.9 years. Most participants (70%) expected improvement in both aesthetics and chewing function. Overall, 65% reported postoperative improvement in both domains. Significant favorable changes were observed in chewing ability, nasal breathing, facial profile, frontal facial appearance, and smile (all p < 0.001). Self-confidence increased from 50% to 87% (p < 0.001), and 95% said they would recommend surgery to others. Conclusion: Orthognathic surgery was associated with high patient-reported satisfaction and favorable functional, aesthetic, and psychosocial outcomes in this sample from the Eastern Province.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.