ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Pain Persisting After Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy: Clinical Features, Pain Phenotypes, and Prospective Outcomes.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the severity and pain phenotypes of chronic pain following bone marrow aspiration (BMA) and/or bone marrow biopsy (BMB). Patients and Methods: In this prospective observational study, 228 adult patients who had undergone BMA and/or BMB were screened at least three months after the procedure. Pain characteristics were assessed using the McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire, Visual Analog Scale, pain DETECT questionnaire (PD-Q), and Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4). Patients reporting pain underwent standardized physical examination focusing on sacroiliac joint provocation tests and pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurement using digital algometry. Results: Chronic pain persisting for ≥3 months was identified in 13 patients (5.7%). Although nociceptive pain features were most common, neuropathic pain components were identified in a substantial subset of patients based on PD-Q and DN4 scores. Physical examination suggested sacroiliac joint-related pain in some patients. PPT values were reduced at the biopsy site in patients with chronic pain, indicating increased local pain sensitivity. Conclusion: In this prospective observational study, chronic pain following BMA and BMB is an underrecognized but clinically relevant complication with heterogeneous pain characteristics. Although neuropathic pain features and findings suggestive of local sensitization were identified in a subset of patients, these observations should be interpreted cautiously given the limited number of affected individuals and the exploratory nature of the analysis. These findings nevertheless support the need for systematic post-procedural pain assessment after BMB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.