ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Procedural Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Older Patients.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide because of population aging and the widespread availability of continuous rhythm monitoring. While medical therapy remains central to management, several procedural strategies are being considered for older patients, including catheter ablation with pulsed field ablation (PFA), atrioventricular node ablation with conduction system pacing (CSP), leadless pacemaker (LPM) implantation, and percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Catheter ablation is an established therapy that reduces AF burden and improves quality of life; however, the role of catheter ablation in older patients has historically been limited by higher complication rates and greater arrhythmia recurrence. The emergence of PFA may expand the role of ablation because of its procedural efficiency and favorable safety profile, although randomized data in older patients remain limited. A pace-and-ablate strategy with CSP offers an alternative for older patients with symptomatic persistent AF or tachy-brady syndrome. Indeed, by engaging the native conduction system, CSP provides more physiological ventricular activation and may reduce the risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. LPMs avoid the lead- and pocket-related complications associated with transvenous pacemakers and may be especially advantageous in frail older patients with multiple comorbidities. LAAO is a potential strategy for stroke prevention that is often proposed for patients unable to tolerate long-term anticoagulation, although randomized data remain conflicting. This narrative review evaluates the current evidence supporting these procedures in older patients with AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.