ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2026
A new high-accuracy QSAR model based on ultra-curated data for predicting thyroid receptor-related endocrine activity.
Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Endocrine active substances interfere with hormone signalling and represent a major regulatory concern. The thyroid system is particularly vulnerable, with disruption linked to neurodevelopmental, metabolic, and cardiovascular effects. Current in vitro assays may improve mechanistic understanding but are resource-intensive while screening databases (e.g., Tox21 assays) is insufficient for large-scale chemical coverage or for assessing new materials. In silico tools such as QSAR models offer scalable alternatives, yet existing thyroid receptor (TR) models suffer from poor data curation, class imbalance, and limited regulatory acceptance. Methods: This study aimed to develop a high-accuracy QSAR model, aligned with the OECD QSAR Assessment Framework, to accurately predict TR-related endocrine activity, thereby supporting the reduction of animal testing and regulatory decision-making. In this work, data from Tox21 TR luciferase agonist and antagonist assays were combined with curated BindingDB data, followed by expert review of activity-cytotoxicity relationships and strict filtering of low-affinity interactions (termed here as "ultra-curation"). Agonists and antagonists were grouped together as "actives". The final dataset comprised 291 active and 6,049 inactive compounds. Each substance was associated with a standardised SMILES, to locate duplicates (subsequently removed), and the dataset split into training, internal validation, and external validation sets with chemical diversity balancing. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier using circular fingerprints (FCFP6) was optimised via grid search. Model performance was evaluated with cross-validation and external validation, complemented by an applicability domain (AD) framework based on analogues. Results: The SVM achieved strong performance in training (balanced accuracy = 96.03%; AUC-ROC = 99.91%; AUC-PR = 99.21%) and robust performance on the external validation set (balanced accuracy = 92.46%; sensitivity = 87.65%; specificity = 99.42%). Incorporation of the AD framework improved minority class (active) detection, raising balanced accuracy to 96.15%, sensitivity to 92.30%, and specificity to 100%, while excluding ~14% of compounds with uncertain predictions. Discussion: The QSAR model developed here demonstrates good predictive accuracy for thyroid receptor-related endocrine activity and addresses key regulatory concerns through rigorous data ultra-curation and applicability domain assessment. This high-accuracy QSAR provides a promising in silico tool to support integrated approaches to testing and assessment (IATA) and regulatory evaluation of endocrine disruption potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.